some time ago in the Peruvian football knows that characterizes a certain stage of the game. Roberto 'Titin' Drago imposed its own rules as to the later of the achievement of a goal. The commenter creates a virtual space of six minutes in which the same computer or the opponent takes to score a second goal.
A PRIORI
A case happens that the very team that scored the opening goal, takes advantage of renegón rival and beat again before the 360 \u200b\u200bseconds.
SIX MINUTES OF CONTROVERSY
All this discussion of knowledge that constitutes the rule in theory but debate comes to snack that much of correlation is in the practice itself, if only a distinction of former player or a rule that can be confirmed in the national football event as a precaution in the minutes after that a goal is scored.
- The whole interval is 213 during 100 evaluable
- Of those 213 intervals, only 40 are periods of six minutes or less, which is to say that the rule has been complied with in a discreet 18.8% of possible cases
- If proclaims the rule with five minutes, the amount was reduced to 34 intervals and the percentage yield an 16.0% .
- However, if the rule will increase to seven minutes, the figure would grow to 42 intervals and reached a percentage 19.7% of
RETROSPECTIVELY
Given the results of the research brief, we can see that the law holds many gaps. The resulting percentage is low and setting up a rule to be extended if after the six minutes is not a goal is scored, the achievement of another goal would be limited, which obviously does not occur.
You, dear reader, will probably slow to less than 360 seconds to read this post. "Time enough to make a second goal? Not always. Surely this rule has been able to become much talked about by their curiosity, but unfortunately it is more likely to be prescribed in a future in which only well-founded rules will remain in the football environment.