T-mobile Call Center Posts Yahoo Answers

Prologue - 'Poison by Prescription; The AZT story, Prof. Peter Duesberg

Poison by Prescription; The AZT story-by John Lauritsen.
Prologue-Prof. Peter Duesberg.

AZT was designed more than twenty years for the treatment of cáncer.Su mechanism exerts its cell killing to prevent the formation of new cells cancer by blocking the development of ADN.Sin chains, however, experiments with AZT in mice cancer showed that AZT did not prolong the life of animals, so it was not accepted for the treatment of cáncer.En 1987 was approved as a treatment for AIDS cure or prevent symptomatic and asymptomatic carriers of HIV, based on hypothesis that HIV causes SIDA.Un year later, in 1988, the designers received a Nobel Prize in medicine, although there was never evidence that AZT could cure or prevent AIDS.

base AZT therapy is simple, disrupt the formation of DNA chains is as AZT VIH.Así must stop AIDS, whether AIDS was caused by HIV, if HIV is multiplying in the AIDS. However, not yet There is no test to validate the hypothesis that HIV causes SIDA.Por Moreover, many studies show that in every AIDS patient studied, there is never more than one HIV-infected cell in 1,000 células.Dado that AZT is a destroyer selective non-dividing cells, ie kill both infected cells and T cells of the immune system must sacrifice 999 uninfected cells to kill a single cell infectada.En view of this and in the absence of a rational explanation that shows the beneficial AZT for AIDS patients, it means that AZT as a treatment for AIDS, has a very high level of toxicity, even if it were to prove that HIV causes AIDS.

There is always room for individual cases, unpredictable situations and small miracles even to science. But if AZT could prevent or cure AIDS would be a miracle if the viral hypothesis of AIDS is unjustified. Unfortunately AZT
not leave much room for miracles because its mechanism of action is embarrassingly clear, block the formation of the DNA strands.

could expect some inexplicable occurrence attributable to divine intervention or have better luck in AIDS treatment with drugs such as aspirin, or even chicken soup, but hardly with a substance that blocks the synthesis of DNA a person when he presents impaired immune response in the formation of lymphocytes.

It is possible that the short-term AZT may provide benefits for AIDS in a person presenting acute microbial infections such as tuberculosis, pneumonia, candidiasis or herpes, and that would kill these microbes, along with host cells. However, confirmed cases these infections can be controlled much better with a specific treatment to leave to chance the toxicity of AZT.

The main rationale of a hypothesis as in the case of the AIDS virus hypothesis is its utility in terms of therapeutic and preventive benefits. The AIDS virus hypothesis has not stopping the spread of AIDS, has not prevented a single AIDS patient, and the number of people in "AZT" is about to reach 50,000 new cases.

utility that AZT has been shown in history against AIDS has been the poison prescription-"Poison by Prescription: The AZT Story" by John Lauritsen.

Peter Duesberg, a professor of Molecular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, April 1990.


NOTE: It was initially administered dose of 1.500 mg AZT. day or more, until today that the dose has been lowered considerably 300 or 600 mg. day, ie 10 to 24 times more than the 25 mg. recommended by the label shown at the beginning with the skull used in the laboratory to alert SIGMA.